AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Debian vs mint11/23/2023 "Massively supported " is the top reason why over 41 developers like Debian, while over 3 developers mention "Simple, Fast, Comfort and Easy to Use" as the leading cause for choosing Linux Mint.Įsa, Webedia, and Code School are some of the popular companies that use Debian, whereas Linux Mint is used by plusEquals, Insoft, and Pixelshift. The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.ĭebian and Linux Mint belong to "Operating Systems" category of the tech stack. What is Linux Mint? The most popular desktop Linux distribution and the 3rd most widely used home operating system behind Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac OS. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. What is Debian? The Universal Operating System. We've got default Wayland, btrfs, a functional app store, pipewire, soon GNOME apps distributed as Flatpak.Debian vs Linux Mint: What are the differences? * Fedora is probably the most stable bleeding-edge distribution, where the future of Linux is being promoted and tested slightly before than anyone else. * Red Hat actually pays people to work on major Linux user-space libraries (wayland, GNOME, pipewire, kernel development), while Ubuntu often goes its own way to create its own solutions that aren't adopted by anyone else. * Ubuntu snap is a dead man walking, often disabled on its own derivative distros (mint, pop_os, etc.), while Fedora/Redhat uses Flatpak which has first-party support pretty much everywhere and it's not under control of a single corporation like snap is. * I'm not a fan of apt, rpm is slightly better Fedora adopts an upstream-first approach (patch only if absolutely necessary) * Maintainers of Debian and Ubuntu derivatives tend to be liberal with patching upstream software, often introducing bugs not present upstream. * Ubuntu GNOME is a frankenstein of patched GNOME software (some from GNOME 40, some from GNOME 3.38), Fedora is stock vanilla upstream GNOME. Why I prefer Fedora to Ubuntu/Debian, in my personal opinion: I recommend Fedora, it's another first-class distro for workstation and people that have work to do, and has nothing to do with Ubuntu or Debian at all. I agree on the sentiment that there's a lot of push for obscure distributions, but it's worth trying the major ones. Of course, one could also choose the option to perpetually hop from distro to distro every other day, if feeling adventurous (or anxious to make a choice) :P (This is a subjective example!)Ĭonsidering there's hundreds of distributions, having some criteria such as high popularity and thorough documentation might be necessary to narrow down the list of choices.ĭistroWatch is good enough for giving you an idea of each distribution's purpose without opening dozens of search tabs. If they want a layer of user-friendliness and official support from many applications, then they could pick Ubuntu instead of plain Debian. With this in mind, it's probably easiest to start with choosing a "root" distribution, and optionally choosing a derivative as necessary if a root distribution isn't specialised or convenient enough for your needs.įor example, if one wants stability and hardware compatibility, one can go straight with Debian. They branch out into specialised distributions such as Ubuntu Server for servers, Kali Linux for pentesting, and so on. Most derivatives generally just add packages and customisation to make a more convenient and specialised derivative.Īt the top of the "family tree" of distributions, you've got "root" distributions such as Slackware and Debian. This is maybe not-done in the linux world, security wise, but if this makes me solve problems faster, I think it makes the machine safer. Sometimes it's just easier to attach a monitor and keyboard and have a GUI. I'm running the desktop version on my server by the way. Maybe I'm going to have to use another distro in the future if my job requires it, and if I have colleagues who use Fedora or Debian or Kali who can help me, I'm willing to give that a try. I'm going to stick with Ubuntu - the LTS versions of course - and that's it. Now I'm back to Ubuntu, and my home server runs it as well. I've tried Fedora as well - too much trouble. I've used Mint for several months, ran into trouble, went back to Ubuntu. I've tried it on the desktop but it was too much trouble there. I've used Debian on hosted servers and have used it on my own little server for several years. I started with Ubuntu on my work/development desktop and have used it on that job for about six years. Distros I tried and used on the desktop: Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |